3.4.1
Legal Protection for Individuals
This is about the people in your product and the people whose information you hold. The commonest mistake is treating “get permission” as one thing — permission to be somewhere and permission to use someone’s image are separate checks with separate answers.
On this page8 sectionsHide
What you need to know
- Explain the privacy and permission issues in the situation you were given.
- Tell libel from slander with a suitable example.
- Describe collecting, using and storing personal data responsibly.
- Explain what inaccurate information does to the individual and to the producer.
Start here
Where you are, and what you are doing there
People can generally take photographs in public places without needing a photography permit. That is not an unlimited licence: it does not cover harassing people, intruding on private situations, or ignoring other restrictions that apply. A producer still has to think about what is being recorded, who it affects and what happens to it afterwards.
Private property is different. Arrange permission from the owner or whoever is authorised to give it, and work to whatever conditions come with it. A shopping centre feels public because anyone can walk in, but it is privately owned — and being allowed to visit is not being allowed to run a commercial film shoot.
Avoid absolutes
“You always need permission for any photograph” is too broad. So is “anything shot in public can be used however you like”. Apply the relevant issue to the situation in front of you.
How it works
Recording it and publishing it are separate decisions
For a planned promotional shoot, the producer needs the permissions that cover the intended commercial use — usually documented through model and location releases. Explain the proposed use clearly when you ask, and arrange parent or guardian permission where children are involved.
A release has to match the project. Agreeing to appear in a school display is not agreeing to appear in a national advert, so check the scope before reusing anything. Sorting this out early is the difference between a finished scene and a reshoot.
| Issue | What the producer has to work out |
|---|---|
| Location permission | Who can authorise filming here, and what conditions come with it? |
| Image use | Do we have permission covering this publication and this commercial use? |
| Privacy | Does recording or publishing this intrude on somebody’s private life? |
| Harassment | Is this conduct distressing, or persistently intrusive? |
Learn the list
Defamation: damage to reputation
Defamation is about statements that harm somebody’s reputation. At this level, remember libel as defamatory material in a written or otherwise lasting form — an online article, for instance — and slander as generally spoken defamatory material in a temporary form. Do not assume anything spoken automatically becomes slander just because it was said out loud.
Think about what a false claim actually does. Publishing that a named organiser stole charity funds could cost them their job and their relationships, not just their reputation. And the producer faces complaints, legal action, compensation and an audience that stops trusting them. Check the evidence, verify names and quotations, and correct mistakes when you find them.
Learn the list
Handling information about real people
Personal data is information relating to an identifiable person — a named survey response, an email address, an identifiable photograph. The data subject is the person it relates to.
People have rights over their information — being informed, asking for access, asking for inaccurate data to be corrected. Rights to deletion or objection apply in relevant circumstances rather than universally. And consent is one possible lawful basis, not the only one, so avoid answering as though everything depends on it.
| Stage | What to do | In a media project |
|---|---|---|
| Collection | Have a lawful basis, explain the purpose, and collect only what you need. | A campaign survey asks about preferences, not home addresses it will never use. |
| Use | Use it for the purpose you stated, and keep it accurate. | Check a contributor’s name before it goes into an interview caption. |
| Storage | Restrict who can get at it and secure it properly. | Only authorised staff can open the folder with participant details in it. |
| Retention | Keep it only as long as it is needed. | Review participant records and delete them securely once the project is finished. |
In the exam
Two issues, explained separately
Worked answer
4 marks
A sports brand plans to photograph young athletes inside a privately owned training centre for a website campaign. Explain two legal issues the producer must consider.
Tempting, but this does not score
They need to get permission before they take the photos, and they also need permission to use the photos on the website.
It is on the right track, but it never says whose permission, what it covers or why it is needed. Two vague versions of “get permission” read as one point made twice.
Worth writing
First, location permission: the training centre is privately owned, so the producer needs authorisation from the owner or manager to film there, under whatever access conditions they set. Second, permission for the athletes’ images: because these will be used in a commercial website campaign, the producer needs releases covering that specific use, and since the athletes are young, that means involving a parent or guardian.
Where the marks come from
- Names the first issue and says whose permission it is — the owner or manager.
- Explains why it applies here: the centre is privately owned.
- Names a genuinely different second issue: image use, not access.
- Ties it to the specifics — commercial use, and young athletes needing a parent or guardian.
What R093 does not ask for
You do not need the names or dates of Acts of legislation. Learn the purpose of each issue, the action it requires, and the impact on the production.
Key takeaways
- Permission to be at a location and permission to use somebody’s image are two different things.
- Being in a public place does not switch off privacy and other considerations.
- Defamation is about damage to reputation. Libel is lasting, slander is generally spoken.
- Personal data has to be handled lawfully, accurately and securely, for a stated purpose.
- You do not need to name any Act of legislation for R093.
Glossary
- Privacy
- A person’s interest in their private life and information not being intruded upon.
- Defamation
- Publishing statements that damage somebody’s reputation.
- Libel
- Defamatory material in a written or otherwise lasting form.
- Slander
- Generally, defamatory speech in a temporary form.
- Personal data
- Information relating to an identifiable person.
- Data subject
- The person the personal data is about.
- Release
- A document recording permission to use someone’s image, or a location, for a stated purpose.
Test yourself
6 questions
Why might a shopping centre still need location permission when anyone can walk in?
It is privately owned, and being allowed in as a visitor does not authorise a commercial shoot.
What is the usual distinction between libel and slander?
Libel is written or otherwise lasting. Slander is generally spoken and temporary.
Give one way to protect stored participant contact details.
Restrict the file to authorised staff using proper account permissions and security.
Why correct an inaccurate interview caption?
It misidentifies the contributor, misleads the audience, and damages both them and the producer’s credibility.
Is permission to use a photograph the same as permission to enter a building?
No — they cover different actions, so both have to be considered separately.
Does every use of personal data need consent?
No. A producer needs an appropriate lawful basis, and consent is only one of the possibilities.
Common questions
Do I need to quote legislation in the exam?
No. This content does not require specific Acts. Explain the issue, the action needed, and why it matters in the scenario.
What if a question just says “explain a legal issue”?
Pick the one the scenario actually raises. A shoot on private property points at location permission; a survey points at personal data.
Can I photograph people in the street for a commercial advert?
Taking a photograph in public is generally different from using it commercially. For a planned advert, arrange the permissions that cover that use.